IMO Net-Zero Framework debate turns to what counts toward compliance
In the UK, IMO participants Norway, China and others submitted proposals in October to revise the organization’s draft Net-Zero Framework ahead of Nov. 23-27 talks in London, addressing concerns over compliance costs, cleaner fuel incentives and emissions targets.
Norway and China proposed different multiplier mechanisms that would give ships extra compliance credit for using zero- and near-zero-emission fuels. China’s approach would count eligible clean fuel energy more heavily when calculating a ship’s greenhouse gas fuel intensity, improving its compliance standing without changing actual emissions.
China’s analysis found that giving ships more compliance credit for zero- and near-zero-emission fuels could reduce biodiesel consumption across the shipping fleet in favor of conventional fuels, increasing actual greenhouse gas emissions without necessarily boosting use of zero- and near-zero-emission alternatives.
Norway proposed stronger emissions targets to counterbalance its multiplier mechanism, alongside greater flexibility in meeting compliance obligations.
The debate extends to which fuels qualify. Brazil proposed restricting biofuel eligibility according to indirect land use change risks, and four shipping and energy industry associations sought credits for emissions avoided through waste-based fuel production.
Category: Sustainable Marine Fuels
