Sustainability: a four-principle approach
Everyone’s for sustainability, it seems. Who could be against it? But what does it mean, exactly?
In my travels, I have found that no two people define it in the same way. Some companies, such as Hawaiian Electric, have specific guidelines that go far beyond other published standards. Trade groups, such as the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil have drafted standards. The Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels has published Version Zero of its principles which is describes as “aspirational” in nature.
Speaking for myself, I feel we are taking too long; aspiration is good, but practical standards are better.
In the absence of agreed international sustainability standards for biofuels, I offer the following Four Principles for your consideration.
FIRST, that biofuels have three classes of “sustainability”. That way, we can recognize fuels which are, at least, a superior substitute for conventional fossil fuels, while leaving room for a “higher grade” of sustainability for those who want better.
SECOND, that the criteria be “lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions.” “other emissions”, “land use”, “labor”, “water” and community participation”. These generally cover the most important environment and social aspects of sustainability.
THIRD, that a table of values is drafted and maintained. I have drafted one, here, to begin the ball rolling.
FOURTH, that a non-profit international board of volunteers serves to modify these sustainability provisions over time, and authorize limited and reasonable sustainability audits to be performed at the cost of the applicant.
What is your own vision of sustainability?
