Quantcast





RSS
January 16, 2009 | Jim Lane | Comments 0

Today in Biofuels Opinion: “The ASA ruled…referring to biofuels as a “sustainable answer to OPEC’s oil” was misleading

From Business Green (UK): “A complaint by environmental journalist George Monbiot that advertisements in the national press by the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) misrepresented biofuels as “sustainable” has been upheld by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) this week. The ASA ruled yesterday that large text at the bottom of the adverts stating referring to biofuels as a “sustainable answer to OPEC’s oil” was misleading, and banned the ads from appearing again in their current form. The advertising standards authority[{said] that the UK government’s Gallagher Review considered biofuel production would result in net greenhouse emissions and loss of biodiversity through habitat destruction in the period to 2020 unless improved policies were put in place to ensure biofuel production targeted idle or marginal land.”

From DNR Online
: “Ethanol production and corn consumption is the key issue because it’s impacting the price of calves and the cost of grain. As producers, we’ve got to adapt. About 63 percent of your production costs come from feed, in some form.”

Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter


bdnl091008Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
or click here to subscribe:

Related Stories


  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “Forage ethanol is not the only answer to our energy needs, but it is a big answer.”
  • Carol Jones, stored product engineer at Oklahoma State University: "Forage ethanol is not the only answer to our energy needs, but it is a big answer. “We’re not certain yet what the first step in...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “GMA needs an excuse to gouge consumers with higher food prices”
  • Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa: “The Grocery Manufacturers Association, I have come to the conclusion, needs an excuse to gouge consumers of America with higher food prices, and an easy scapegoat for i...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “The WSJ edit page really, really doesn’t like ethanol or government mandates to keep producing the stuff.”
  • From Platts: "U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) said calls by congressional leaders, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, to merge energy and climate change legislation and pass the bill this...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “Get your damn Corn out of my Gas”
  • From Energy Tribune: "I am not trying to come down either for or against ethanol tariffs, but rather to discuss what I see as the key issues surrounding them. By all accounts, ethanol from sugarcane i...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “If we let Brazil help us solve our problem at the price of more rainforest destruction, have we really gained anything?”
  • Former US President Bill Clinton: "What people are worried about Brazil is not (whether) you have the most efficient biofuel in the world... everybody knows that is true...the world would say if we le...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “Why not elephant dung and World War Two-era fungus?”
  • From Fast Company: "Hemp, soy, mustard, sunflower and palm oil can all be used to make biofuels, so why not elephant dung and World War Two-era fungus? Copenhagen-based Danisco A/S is using the fungus...

    Hot Topics


    The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
    Latest algae-to-energy news
    Latest jatropha news
    Latest Waste-to-energy news

    Entry Information

    Filed Under: Opinion

    Tags:

    RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    You must be logged in to post a comment.