UK’s Guardian newspaper says suppressed World Bank report blames 75 percent food price increase on biofuels
The Guardian newspaper in the UK said that it had obtained a copy of an explosive report, which found that biofuels were responsible for a 75 percent increase in food prices, a startling variance from USDA estimates of a 2-3 percent increase and reports funded by food companies showing increases of up to 35 percent. The Guardian said that “Senior development sources believe the report, completed in April, has not been published to avoid embarrassing President George Bush.” The online journal Grist used the report’s appearance for a thoughtful review of recent studies on the impact of biofuels on food prices.
Food vs fuel studies and controversy background
The Food Before Food coalition called on Governor Jon Corzine to request a waiver from the ethanol mandate and the Renewable Fuel Standard.
Meanwhile, CNN.com reported on studies sponsored by Kraft Foods and a related coalition of food producers, Balanced Food and Fuel. Both studies projected that a 50 percent reduction in the Renewable Fuel Standard would drop corn prices by $2 per bushel. However a chart on the balancedfoodandfuel.org website projects the corn price at only $3.40 per bushel in 2010, dropping to $3.15 per bushel in 2016.
Meanwile, USDA under secretary Thomas Dorr pledged at the Corn Utilization and Technology Conference to give farmers more support in the food vs fuel debate. Dorr said the Department would highlight that ethanol has caused only 0.25% of the 4.5% increase in food prices and was holding down gas prices.
The EPA comments period in the Renewable Fuel Standard waiver consideration process ended this week. Just before the end of the comments period, the Balanced Food and Fuel coalition (American Meat Institute, National Chicken Council, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, National Meat Association, National Milk Producers Federation, National Pork Producers Council, National Turkey Federation and United Egg Producers) submitted a paper commissioned from FarmEcon, and Kraft Foods submitted a paper it commissioned from Keith Collins (former chief economist of the USDA), supporting the call for the waiver by highlighting a high impact on corn prices and negligible impact on fuel prices from corn ethanol. The foodbeforefuel.org website funded by the Grocery Manufacturers Association has a link to both studies and is promoting them via press releases.
What do you think? What do you think this story means for bioenergy? Leave a comment below and get the community engaged on what you see as the real issues - others will be glad you did!
Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily.
triumph181 | Jul 8, 2008 | Reply
This is a complete load of propaganda from a group of incredibly rich manipulators who have zero conscious and even less ethics. I can concede some fluctuation in the corn market due to bioethanol, but what percentage is due to the inflated gas prices we will never know. What percentage is also due to the endless chain of middlemen who hijack the food chain at every turn?
Rice has tripled in value on the world markets and no biofuels are made of rice. The grocery Manufacturers Association is for sale and the going price was $300,000 as was widely reported recently. If we do not stop these idiots now we will face the same horrible consequences we now face from stopping all nuclear power after three Mile Island. The same bleating cretins who called for the halt to nuclear power then are now screaming to have it restarted.
We, builders of alternative sources of energy must listen politely to these clowns, then ignore them and move on, eliminating one problem at a time. I can hardly wait for the day we bring algae production online only to be stopped by the society for the protection of the monocell.