Quantcast





RSS
July 04, 2008 | Jim Lane | Comments 1

Wisconsin warns that blending ethanol with unreformulated gasoline increases emissions

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources said that the blending of ethanol with unreformulated gasoline will cause an increase in nitrous oxide emissions and ground-level ozone smog. Reformulated gasoline has a lower evaporation point, and was traditionally used in Wisconsin until the passage of the Energy Independence and Security Act in December massively increased the ethanol blending activity in the state.

Ethanol blending background: E20/E30

In Washington, the American Coalition on Ethanol presented findings on research showing that cars running on E20 and E30 blends achieved better mileage than cars running 100 percent conventional gasoline. Scientists at General Motors, whose cars were involved in the test, were unable to explain how the ethanol blend, which contained 6 to 11 percent less BTUs, could get better mileage. In the tests, a Chevrolet Impala flex-fuel vehicle running E20 achieved 15 percent better mileage than when running 100 percent gasoline. Tests were also conducted on Toyota vehicles.

The president of the Renewable Fuels Association, Bob Dineen, recently said that the RFA and the state of Minnesota have engaged in a test program for higher blends of ethanol than E10. The study looks at materials compatibility, drivability and emissions. Dineen said that although the full test data is not in, he hasn’t seen any show-stoppers that would prevent conversion to E20. An unrelated Department of Energy study is looking at durability and the impact of E20 or higher on small conventional engines. Dineen said he is hopeful that an application could be made next year to the EPA for permission to use higher level ethanol blends.

E20 efforts are on the rise on many fronts. USDA Under Secretary for Rural Development Tom Dorr, speaking at the NAFB’s Trade Talk event, told the Brownfield Network “Everybody that wants to invest has to have assurance that we can get past this E10 blend wall. The Department of Energy … and EPA are aggressively pursuing how to get to …. E15 or and E20.”

South Dakota Senator John Thune met earlier this year with the director of President Bush’s economic council to push for an E20 mandate to increase demand for ethanol. Thune said that lack of support from automakers was unimportant compared to the importance of reducing US dependence on foreign oil.

In Michigan, automakers have responded to news of Minnesota’s testing of E20. They stated flatly that the fuel does not have EPA approval and is illegal. A General Motors spokesman told USA Today that in a GM test of E20 in Australia, “40% of the vehicles sustained (catalytic converter) damage, which allowed essentially unchecked tailpipe emissions.” Chrysler added that use of E20 would void the manufacturers’ warranty.

A new study by the University of Minnesota and Minnesota State University suggest that US cars could burn E20 without flex-fuel engines. Gene Hugoson, Minnesota agriculture commissioner told USA Today “We see E20 not exactly as bypassing E85, but supplementing it.” Ethanol proponents have targeted E20 as an alternative to E85, which has been dogged by controversy and low sales.

Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley recently called on President Bush to direct the Environmental Protection Agency to approve E15, E20, E30 blends. Grassley said that with E85 not gaining acceptance, the US had to find other ways to ensure a market for higher blends of ethanol.

The Kansas Department of Agriculture has launched a project to offer flex-fuel vehicle owners a choice of E10, E20, E30, E50 and E85 at selected service stations, and will study the fuel efficiency.

Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter


bdnl091008Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
or click here to subscribe:

Related Stories


  • 2nd generation biofuels ranked eighth out of 18 climate change strategies by 1350 experts; 1st generation biofuels ranks last
  • A new study of global climate change decision makers placed first-generation biofuels last in a field of 18 climate change-mitigating strategies, with second-generation fuels placing eighth in the sur...
  • Wisconsin gasoline retailers sue Renew85, Utica Energy for unfair pricing
  • A lawsuit has been filed by 42 gasoline retailers  of 42 gasoline stations in Wisconsin against Utica Energy and Renew 85, for selling ethanol blended fuels at below the minimum market price. There...
  • Western Wisconsin Energy improves ethanol yields by 18 percent, increases proposed capacity to 59 Mgy
  • In Wisconsin, Western Wisconsin Energy has increased its proposed capacity from 50 Mgy to 59 Mgy after implementing new technology that would allow it to increase ethanol yields from corn by 18 percen...
  • Prison power: Sierra Club aims to increase biomass, reduce coal in Wisconsin prisons
  • In Wisconsin, the Sierra Club is pursuing an agreement with the Wisconsin prison system to reduce emissions by introducing more biomass to partially replace coal-fired power. A plan for the system not...
  • Unity Biofuels debuts in-pump ethanol blending system; could make E85 cost competitive with gasoline on cost-per-mile
  • In Ohio, Unity Biofuels has debuted a technology to permit blending of ethanol and gasoline in the pump. Currently, ethanol is blended into gasoline at the terminal. At stake: under US law, the $0.51 ...
  • Renergie receives gop-ahead for vehicle testing of low-cost hydrous ethanol in the US
  • In Florida, hydrous ethanol producer Renergie moved closer to market with an agreement to conduct a 15 month, sixty vehicle test program with hydrous ethanol in blends of  E10, E20, E30, and E85 to i...

    Hot Topics


    The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
    Latest algae-to-energy news
    Latest jatropha news
    Latest Waste-to-energy news

    Entry Information

    Filed Under: Policy

    RSSComments: 1  |  Post a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    1. If the claim is true that ethanol ruins the air, then neighboring Minnesota must be creating quite a nuisance there in Wisconsin.

      Ask those people in Minneapolis what they think. I think they will say that they love the stuff.

      I use E85 in New York State and am saving almost 20% on the cost per mile of travel in my old converted Subaru Outback. E85 sells here for about $3, vs gasoline over $4, and my mileage is only 15% less. So on a miles/dollar basis, I am way ahead.

      Ben Green
      Albany, NY

    RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    You must be logged in to post a comment.