Today in Biofuels Opinion: “Tinkering with energy regulation can have disastrous consequences”
Editorial by the Los Angeles Times: “The EPA should waive the ethanol requirement, but if that’s the only outcome of the ethanol brouhaha, the country will still lose. Lawmakers should see this as an important lesson: Tinkering with energy regulation can have disastrous consequences, especially when it’s done on behalf of special interests rather than the national interest. Given the number of phenomenally bad proposals for lowering oil prices floating around the Capitol, this lesson could not come at a more critical time.”
Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, chairman of Nestlé SA, in the Wall Street Journal: “Biofuels are economical nonsense, ecologically useless and ethically indefensible. Every 10,000 litres of water produces as little as five litres of ethanol, or one to two litres of biodiesel. This year, the U.S. will use around 130 million tons of corn for biofuels. This corn was not available as human food, nor as fodder to animals. Is this the right strategy, for a product that won’t satisfy even a small percentage of our energy needs?”
Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter
Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
Related Stories
Hot Topics
The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
Latest algae-to-energy news
Latest jatropha news
Latest Waste-to-energy news
Entry Information
Filed Under: Opinion
Comments: 1 | Post a Comment | Trackback URL
Post a Comment | Trackback URL
You must be logged in to post a comment.


Scottla | Jul 3, 2008 | Reply
I’ll not reprise the pro/con of the food for fuel debate here. What I am curious about is Peter Brabeck-Letmathe’s comments about water use and fuel production. !0,000 litres is roughly 2,600 gallons, so his comment suggests that it takes 2,600 gallons of water to produce 2 gallons of ethanol.
From where do these numbers come? General production figures I’m familiar with are at ratios of roughly 3:1! It’s outlandish claims and bizarre calculations like this that make this debate, at least currently, so ineffective.
(As an aside, it’s worth noting that it takes roughly 2 gallons of water to complete the production of one gallon of gasoline. These are the numbers that will result from efficient cellulosic ethanol production, if not better.)