Quantcast





RSS
July 03, 2008 | Jim Lane | Comments 1

Today in Biofuels Opinion: “Tinkering with energy regulation can have disastrous consequences”

Editorial by the Los Angeles Times: “The EPA should waive the ethanol requirement, but if that’s the only outcome of the ethanol brouhaha, the country will still lose. Lawmakers should see this as an important lesson: Tinkering with energy regulation can have disastrous consequences, especially when it’s done on behalf of special interests rather than the national interest. Given the number of phenomenally bad proposals for lowering oil prices floating around the Capitol, this lesson could not come at a more critical time.”

Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, chairman of Nestlé SA, in the Wall Street Journal: “Biofuels are economical nonsense, ecologically useless and ethically indefensible. Every 10,000 litres of water produces as little as five litres of ethanol, or one to two litres of biodiesel. This year, the U.S. will use around 130 million tons of corn for biofuels. This corn was not available as human food, nor as fodder to animals. Is this the right strategy, for a product that won’t satisfy even a small percentage of our energy needs?”

Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter


bdnl091008Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
or click here to subscribe:

Related Stories


  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “Near-negligible carbon mitigation, competition for arable land, and poor economics.”
  • From Brownfield Network: "While saying he’s a “strong supporter of renewable fuels,” Congressman Bob Goodlatte of Virginia last week urged President Obama, Ag Secretary Vilsack and EPA administr...
  • 20 advanced biofuel companies write to California ARB over proposed indirect land-use change regulation
  • In California, more than 20 advanced biofuel companies, plus key California-based researchers and investors, wrote to the California Air Resources Board regarding the Draft Regulation for the Californ...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “The New York Times has again misled the public on a crucial issue concerning U.S. biofuels policy.”
  • Brooke Coleman of the New Fuels Alliance: "With presumably the best intentions, the New York Times has again misled the public on a crucial issue concerning U.S. biofuels policy. Casting the issue as ...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “[By 2030] biofuels are expected to take the place of about 25% of the US petrol market.”
  • Danny Murphy, Mississippi’s director for the American Soybean Association: “We disagree with the figures being used in the proposed [indirect land use change] rule. This regulation is based on fla...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “If we got the prices we anticipated — high $3s — everybody would be happy. Ethanol would be cruising along just fine.”
  • Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger of California, commenting on the Bush administrations refusal to pursue carbon dioxide regulation under the Clean Air Act: "Well, to be honest with you, if they would ha...
  • Today in Biofuels Opinion: “If the reason for the Cash for Clunkers program is to pollute less all that’s required is to allow those automobiles to also run in ethanol.”
  • Growth Energy: "Finalizing the [California Low Carbon Fuel Standard] regulation with the proposed amendments would have serious unintended economic and environmental consequences, both for California ...

    Hot Topics


    The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
    Latest algae-to-energy news
    Latest jatropha news
    Latest Waste-to-energy news

    Entry Information

    Filed Under: Opinion

    RSSComments: 1  |  Post a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    1. I’ll not reprise the pro/con of the food for fuel debate here. What I am curious about is Peter Brabeck-Letmathe’s comments about water use and fuel production. !0,000 litres is roughly 2,600 gallons, so his comment suggests that it takes 2,600 gallons of water to produce 2 gallons of ethanol.

      From where do these numbers come? General production figures I’m familiar with are at ratios of roughly 3:1! It’s outlandish claims and bizarre calculations like this that make this debate, at least currently, so ineffective.

      (As an aside, it’s worth noting that it takes roughly 2 gallons of water to complete the production of one gallon of gasoline. These are the numbers that will result from efficient cellulosic ethanol production, if not better.)

    RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    You must be logged in to post a comment.