Argonne National Lab researchers update GREET emission model: free download, update includes Brazilian ethanol, butanol, Fischer-Tropsch
May 9, 2008
Researchers at the Argonne National Laboratory have updated the GREET model for estimating emissions benefits from conversion to biofuels. The newest update will allow scientists to model combustion of ethanol produced from Brazilian sugarcane and used by U.S. automobiles; production and use of bio-butanol as a potential transportation fuel; and production and use of biodiesel and renewable diesel via hydrogenation, coal/biomass co-feeding for Fischer-Tropsch diesel production and various corn ethanol plant types with different process fuels. Free download of GREET is available here.
GREET can simulate more than 100 fuel production pathways and more than 80 vehicle/fuel systems, and has more than 4,000 registered users worldwide.
In February, researchers Michael Wang, at the Argonne National Laboratory, and Zia Haq, at the Department of Energy, offered a detailed response to the Science magazine article authored by a team led by Timothy Searchinger.
Wang’s analysis shows a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from corn ethanol, compared to the Science magazine results. In the response, the authors indicate that Searchinger’s team made errors in updating the 1999 GREET model developed at Argonne by a team led by Wang.
According to Wang and Haq, Searchinger modeled a case where corn ethanol production reached 30 billion gallons, compared to the 15 billion cap envisioned in the Energy Security and Independence Act; did not increase corn yields; underestimated the protein content of distiller’s grains by 23 percent, incorrectly assumed a 62 percent drop in corn exports for 2007, omitted a 400 percent increase in distiller’s grain exports, assumed constant deforestation rates in the Amazon and other areas despite downward trends, and did not account for an increase in corn ethanol production efficiency.
Wang and Haq warned policymakers that indirect land-use modeling was in its infancy and not to be misguided by accepting results as definitive at this stage of model evolution.
In a further clarification on the Science magazine controversy, an author of one of the two articles published recently in Science magazine, David Tilman, gave an interview to the Minnesota Daily regarding the study. “The goal of our paper was to point out if we do certain things, that those things would give us fuels that didn’t have very much environmental benefit,” he said. Tilman added that the paper didn’t say the problems were occurring in the present, but that they could occur in the future.
Comments
Got something to say?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
FREE Subscription
The Biofuels Daily News DigestThe biofuels 4-minute "must read"
It's the world's most widely-read biofuels daily e-mail newsletter, providing news, data and insight every morning to subscribers at more than 2,000 companies around the globe. “This is a great news source which I look forward to reading every day.” - Tina B.
“Biofuels Digest is a great way to keep up on the news. I appreciate the ease with which I can pinpoint research topics.” - Diane B.
-
Recent Posts
- FREE Subscription: The Daily Biofuels News Digest, the industry’s 4-minute “must-read” email
- EPA Administrator to rule today on ethanol waiver; CNBC says waiver request will be denied
- Today in Biofuels Opinion: “We’re going to double the amount of energy that comes from renewable sources by the end of my first term and that means investing in solar and wind and biodiesel.”
