Browse > Home / Policy / New York Times says Energy Act safeguards “now look very smart” in light of global Science magazine article controversy

New York Times says Energy Act safeguards “now look very smart” in light of global Science magazine article controversy

February 25, 2008

The New York Times ran an editorial reviewing the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act in light of recent articles in Science magazine regarding greenhouse gas emissions and biofuels.

The Times said “The final bill correctly included environmental safeguards. The most important is a requirement that ethanol, regardless of its source, achieve at least a 20 percent reduction in greenhouse gases compared with conventional gasoline….The calculations would have to account for both direct emissions — those associated with growing, harvesting and refining corn or other feedstocks — and indirect emissions, including those caused by changes in land use as acres devoted to producing food were converted to producing fuel. These safeguards now look very smart.”

The complete supporting online material from the Searchinger study, including well-to-wheel emission tables can be downloaded (free) here. Reaction from world press is linked below, most of it strong reading, usually condemning biofuels:

The Register
San Francisco Chronicle
World Changing
Wall Street Journal
Science
The Morning Call
TIME
National Post (Canada)
CTV
The Car Connection
The Nature Conservancy
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
Washington Post
25×25 response

More on the Science magazine controversy from Biofuels Digest:

UK government has ordered a revised analysis review on biofuels.
Greenpeace called on the government to suspend biofuels targets.

European Federation for Transport and Environment says quantity targets for biofuels should be dropped in favor of a low-carbon standard.

Argonne National Lab says Science article authors’ models did not factor in changing crop yields

Bad, bad biofuels”, more Science magazine reaction, and downloads to complete underlying data

A group of scientists write to US President George Bush and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urging them to revise US biofuels policies

Biofuels emissions authors say biofuels OK if made from waste, perennials, or abandoned land

93 percent increase in greenhouse gases? Renewable Fuel Association says fossil fuels created the “carbon debt we can never repay”

Nature Conservancy study says converting land for biofuels increases net carbon usage

  • President Bush says US must “Get off oil”, says rising corn costs should not prompt retreat from biofuels, but more R&D
    • Speaking at the Washington International Renewable Energy Conference (WIREC), President George W. Bush said that the United States needed to "get off oil" and backed cellulosic ethanol as the best pat...
  • EPA gains vast powers in Energy Act: can alter timetable, waive targets, determine emission models
    • In Washington, the Environmental Protection Agency will have vastly expanded powers to determine crop policy and the rate of biofuels expansion, under the Energy Independence and Security Act signed i...
  • Analyst says Science magazine article erred on corn ethanol emissions; ethanol may raise needed barrier to land-use conversion for homes
    • An analysis of two articles appearing in Science magazine, which have led to resounding reversals in global biofuels policy, reports that actual land use conversion in the US, primarily from soy to co...
  • Today in Biofuels: Virgin makes historic biodiesel test flight; Aventine faces cash crunch in financing boo-boo; NY Times says Energy Act safeguards “look very smart”
    • Top Story:In England, Virgin Atlantic Airways completed a successful test flight of a biodiesel-powered 747 aircraft, traveling from London to Amsterdam. One of the four engines ran on B20, supplied b...
  • Science magazine article claims biofuels will add carbon, destroy forests
    • The Guardian (UK) published an account of an upcoming article in Science magazine which concludes that switching from fossil fuels to biofuels will add more carbon to the atmosphere, destroy primary f...
  • Newsday calls biofuels supporters “Biofools” in Science magazine article aftermath
    • Reaction to last week's shocking Science magazine articles continued, with a negative editorial in Newsday that called biofuels supporters "Biofools". The editorial stated that "ethanol and other biof...

    Written by Jim Lane · Filed Under Policy 

    Comments

    Got something to say?

    You must be logged in to post a comment.