Comments on: Newsday calls biofuels supporters “Biofools” in Science magazine article aftermath http://biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2008/02/19/newsday-calls-biofuels-supporters-biofools-in-science-magazine-article-aftermath/ The world's most widely-read biofuels daily Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:40:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: mtbottle http://biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2008/02/19/newsday-calls-biofuels-supporters-biofools-in-science-magazine-article-aftermath/#comment-1100 mtbottle Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:43:19 +0000 http://biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2008/02/19/newsday-calls-biofuels-supporters-biofools-in-science-magazine-article-aftermath/#comment-1100 This is a ridiculous article. If there are biofools, then might I suggest that the author of this article is one. Look, there is plenty of oil money associated with this so called study. Also the figures used to come to these conclusions are from old data. There is no fact here at all. If they want to compare ethanol and other biofuels, then lets take a close looks at what the oil industry is doing in Alberta. When you really look at the facts, not some fictuous study, then you see that ethanol and other biofuels comes out squeaky clean. This is a ridiculous article. If there are biofools, then might I suggest that the author of this article is one.

Look, there is plenty of oil money associated with this so called study.

Also the figures used to come to these conclusions are from old data. There is no fact here at all.

If they want to compare ethanol and other biofuels, then lets take a close looks at what the oil industry is doing in Alberta.

When you really look at the facts, not some fictuous study, then you see that ethanol and other biofuels comes out squeaky clean.

]]>