Quantcast





RSS
February 15, 2008 | Jim Lane | Comments 0

Bad, bad biofuels: negative reaction to Science emission articles pours in from world press; emission tables, data ready now online for download

Reaction to two articles published in Science magazine continues to pour in from the world’s media, almost universally dismissing the potential for biofuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

But the lead author of one of the studies, Timothy Searchinger of Princeton University, offered some hope in a Science magazine podcast interview.

“The key” he said, “is you want to avoid using productive land because for the most part that productive land is either producing a lot of carbon benefits, carbon savings right now or food that has to be replaced. So that means, for example, if we make biofuels out of waste products, we don’t have that land conversion problem. And that’s a pure benefit. There is also some thought that you might be able to find really degraded, marginal cropland and use that to produce biofuels on. That may, in fact, be true in some cases, but it’s going to be very, very specific because if it’s degraded, not producing a lot of crops, the question is whether it will produce a lot of biofuels.

The complete supporting online material from the Searchinger study
, including well-to-wheel emission tables can be downloaded (free) here.

Reaction from world press is linked below, most of it strong reading, usually condemning biofuels:

The Register
San Francisco Chronicle
World Changing
Wall Street Journal
Science
The Morning Call
TIME
National Post (Canada)
CTV
The Car Connection
The Nature Conservancy
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
Washington Post
25×25 response

More on the Science magazine controversy from Biofuels Digest:

A group of scientists write to US President George Bush and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urging them to revise US biofuels policies

Biofuels emissions authors say biofuels OK if made from waste, perennials, or abandoned land

93 percent increase in greenhouse gases? Renewable Fuel Association says fossil fuels created the “carbon debt we can never repay”

Nature Conservancy study says converting land for biofuels increases net carbon usage


Free Subscription to the Daily Biofuels Digest e-newsletter


bdnl091008Subscribe FREE to the world's most-widely read biofuels daily. Enter your email in the box below,
or click here to subscribe:

Related Stories


  • Newsday calls biofuels supporters “Biofools” in Science magazine article aftermath
  • Reaction to last week's shocking Science magazine articles continued, with a negative editorial in Newsday that called biofuels supporters "Biofools". The editorial stated that "ethanol and other biof...
  • 10 Stories We Probably Should Have Read: a Biofuels Digest aniversary special report
  • #1. An article on Cuban plans for a massive ethanol expansion in February didn't attract much attention, but it helped explain that Cuban support for Jean "Biofuels are a crime against humanity" Ziegl...
  • Today in Biofuels: “Bad, bad biofuels”, more Science magazine reaction, and downloads to complete underlying data; US institutions pledge $10 billion in green tech investment over next 2 years
  • Top Story:Reaction to two articles published in Science magazine continues to pour in from the world's media, almost universally dismissing the potential for biofuels to reduce greenhouse gas emission...
  • Science magazine aftermath: respondents say new models forgot yield growth and distillers grains
  • In Washington, biofuels associations and academics continued to respond to Science magazine articles published last week that condemned US biofuel production efforts. The Argonne National Laborator...
  • 13 US newspapers run syndicated column linking biofuels to “chronic hunger, malnutrition and starvation” in poverty-stricken nations
  • Anti-biofuels sentiment continues to gain traction in the wake of two articles published in Science magazine questioning the emissions benefits of ethanol. An editorial by David Ridenour of the Nation...
  • New York Times says Energy Act safeguards “now look very smart” in light of global Science magazine article controversy
  • The New York Times ran an editorial reviewing the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act in light of recent articles in Science magazine regarding greenhouse gas emissions and biofuels. The Time...

    Hot Topics


    The Hottest 50 Companies in Bioenergy
    Latest algae-to-energy news
    Latest jatropha news
    Latest Waste-to-energy news

    Entry Information

    Filed Under: The Daily Biofuel Summary

    RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL

    You must be logged in to post a comment.