Nature Conservancy study says converting land for biofuels increases net carbon usage

February 7, 2008

A Nature Conservancy study has found that converting land to biofuel crop cultivation releases more carbon into the air than the carbon savings achieved by substitution of biofuels for fossil fuels. The study results will be published in Science magazine next month, and examines the conversion of forest, grasslands, and peatlands, and the release of carbon stored in those areas when the lands are cleared for cultivation.

The study is not dissimilar to a study previously published in Science last year. The Guardian (UK) published an account of an article in Science magazine which concludes that switching from fossil fuels to biofuels will add more carbon to the atmosphere, destroy primary forests, and destroy economies.

The study cited in Science is based on the conversion of forest for biofuel feedstock cropland. The authors found that clearing one hectare of rainforest puts 200 cubic tons of carbon into the atmosphere and reduces the forest’s carbon absorption by 175 cubics tons of carbon per year, with a benefit of no more than 56 cubic tons of carbon by using the biofuels in place of fossil fuels.

Bad, bad biofuels: negative reaction to Science emission articles pours in from world press; emission tables, data ready now online for download

Reaction to two articles published in Science magazine continues to pour in from the world's media, almost universally dismissing the potential for biofuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But ...

Science magazine aftermath: respondents say new models forgot yield growth and distillers grains

In Washington, biofuels associations and academics continued to respond to Science magazine articles published last week that condemned US biofuel production efforts. The Argonne National Laborator...

Newsday calls biofuels supporters “Biofools” in Science magazine article aftermath

Reaction to last week's shocking Science magazine articles continued, with a negative editorial in Newsday that called biofuels supporters "Biofools". The editorial stated that "ethanol and other biof...

New York Times says Energy Act safeguards “now look very smart” in light of global Science magazine article controversy

The New York Times ran an editorial reviewing the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act in light of recent articles in Science magazine regarding greenhouse gas emissions and biofuels. The Time...

Analyst says Science magazine article erred on corn ethanol emissions; ethanol may raise needed barrier to land-use conversion for homes

An analysis of two articles appearing in Science magazine, which have led to resounding reversals in global biofuels policy, reports that actual land use conversion in the US, primarily from soy to co...

Reactions to Science magazine: the good, the bad, and the ugly, from the Natural Resources Defence Council, Wall Street Journal, and others

Nathanael Green, senior policy analyst with the Natural Resources Defense Council, offered the most thoughtful analysis to date of two articles that appeared in Science magazine.The articles have rece...

Written by Jim Lane · Filed Under Research